Doctor Issachar

  In a zoom forum on behalf of a Florida United Church Of Christ Congregation, Brian McLaren equated religious conservatives with a plague needing to be eradicated. In particular, being referenced was the activist theologian's ebook “The Second Pandemic: The Rise Of Authoritarianism & Your Future”. The ironic thing is that the sort of socialist reforms McLaren any other time advocates for would also require a dictatorship to implement. Apparently he is appalled at White authoritarians, but not a single word about minority hooligans burning down or looting the property of those that they disagree with. In his analysis, McLaren hypothesizes that women that voted for Trump did so out of fear of abusive husbands. So does he intend to also condemn women that coerce men into going along with feminist drivel out of fear of being categorized as abusive? In his remarks, McLaren reflects upon the tendency of authoritarian movements to need some sort of enemy to rally their cause around. Perhaps someone needs to point out how he himself is doing this in regards to Trump and the amorphous boogeyman of “systematic racism” which is alleged to be everywhere and which no one can define. by Frederick Meekins

Representative Marjory Greene has been removed from her committee assignments in the House of Representatives not so much for anything that she has done but rather because of what she believed. It was claimed that the so-called conspiracy theories she is accused of professing cannot be countenanced because of the “festering malignancy” of such ideas. Nothing similar was done to punish Raphael Warnock for questionable notions the pastor has peddled or lent support to over the years of his ministry. For example, Warnock has downplayed the atrocities of Fidel Castro, calling the Cuban dictator’s legacy complex. Yet it’s doubtful the Georgia radical would be that judicious in his assessment of the Trump presidency despite the administration having a significantly smaller body count in terms of citizens eliminated for merely expressing an ideology at variance with that preferred by regime functionaries. Warnack is a bit more explicit in his admiration of the late theologian James Cone, whom Warack describes as his mentor and whom Warack eulogized at his funeral. For those not as familiar with James Cone as they might be Fidel Castro, Cone is renowned as the developer of Black Liberation theology. As part of that interpretative school of thought, Cone equates Whites or “Whiteness” with Satan and/or the Antichrist. His acolytes will quibble that “Whiteness” is more about the way in which such people act rather than the people themselves. Would a renowned theologian of the contemporary era be allowed to equate “Jewishness” or better yet “Blackishness” with the most vile works of evil and be permitted to retain their endowed chair or posh ministry position? More importantly, if the Biden Autarchy and the regime’s legislative allies in the People’s Assembly (also known as Congress in times before the assent of one party rule seemingly intent on squelching as much dissent as possible) say nothing in condemnation it must likely mean that these powerful institutions support these forms of tyranny and oppression perceived as originating from the left side of the political spectrum. By Frederick Meekins

Totalitarianism: How Christians Can Resist The New Cultural Religion Evangelistic Outreach In The Age Of Covid The Soulwinner’s Task Testimony As Evangelistic Outreach Photographer Explains Why She Left Elevation Church Monks & Monasticism In The Anglican Tradition An Introduction To Anglicanism An Introduction To Lutheranism Catholic But Reformed What Began The Rise Of Fascism In Europe Termagant Fails To Comply With Own Magnetometer Edict Biden Regime Sits Idly As Antifa Rampages Throughout Capital Is Your Vaccination Status Any Of The Church’s Business? Southern Baptist Functionary Insists Opposing Wokism Denies Humanity Of Black People Where Do We Go From Here with George F. Will History PhD’s In The World Of Entrepreneurship A Gushing Media In Cultural Purgatory Independent Baptist vs Methodist: What’s The Difference? Doll’s Backstory Manipulated To Advance Social Indoctrination Plague Cult Priestess Exposed Without Countenance Concealment Hollywood Reprobate Calls For The Elimination Of The Biblicist Menace

Utopians, especially of the revolutionary variety, are never satisfied. That is an undeniable truth of history. One only needs to read an account of Jacobin France, Nazi Germany, Bolshevist Russia, or Maoist China to draw such a conclusion. In the future, one must ask, will Biden's America be added to that infamous list? It has been pointed out that one does not have an inherent constitutional right to social media. Since those are private corporations viewed as individuals in the eyes of the law, to compel such would be to infringe upon its rights in a coercive manner. Perhaps fair enough. But it must be asked will the matter stop there in regards to those commodities or services that don't quite rise to the level of government but without which the individual's quality of life is profoundly hampered? For example, most electricity is provided through what is ultimately private enterprise. So what if in the future an electric company does not like how its commodity is being utilized in pursuit of a perfectly legal but ideologically unacceptable values or agendas such as to light a church opposed to homosexual marriage marriage or that professed the belief in Christ alone is the only path to obtain a beatific afterlife? In the future, sophisticated computers and Artificial Intelligence will play a role in the way in which personal vehicles are piloted. Should individuals known to express or even be suspected of harboring certain opinions have their ignition systems shut down entirely so as to inhibit their ability to travel in a manner not unlike the interlock system imposed upon drunk drivers? Don't laugh. It has already been proposed that those at the Capitol Kerfuffle should be placed on the don't fly list without even having been convicted of a crime. And who before this time thought steps would be taken to silence former presidents and seated senators who did not actually call for violence but rather whose words were not those preferred by the gatekeepers of the means of communication? By Frederick Meekins