IMG_0749

1- "Everything WHO does goes AGAINST the principles of public health"08/08/2022 / By Ethan Huff Abir Ballan has put together a 43-page thesis called “The WHO Review and Why It Matters to You” that exposes the World Health Organization (WHO) "as a highly corrupt political organization pushing tyranny in the name of “public health.”Published on the Pandemics Data & Analytics (PANDA) website, "the thesis directly challenges WHO’s alleged authority as a leader in global public health"It reveals that almost nothing WHO does has anything to do with public health as pretty much all of it is politically driven.“This review empowers you with key information to help you assess the WHO’s candidacy as an authoritative global public health organization,” PANDA said. “It provides background information on public health and pandemic management principles as previously agreed upon by this branch of the United Nations.”“The PANDA analysis will allow you to evaluate the soundness of the WHO-recommended response to [Wuhan coronavirus] COVID-19 and monkeypox, and to determine how faithfully the WHO followed its own previously developed recommendations. It goes on to summarize the assumptions underlying their Covid-19 recommendations, followed by a summary of the final recommendations.”WHO is supposed to protect medical freedom and support individual bodily autonomyWHO is supposed to follow the 10 Public Health Principles outlined in its official policies whenever dealing with a public health emergency. Instead, the United Nations arm scrapped them all when COVID-19 arrived.The first principle, which deals with human dignity and personal freedoms, was pretty much a no-go as WHO supported lockdowns, business closures, "masks and other forms of medical fascism""WHO has also been implicated in possibly building and releasing the coronavirus bioweapon.)"2-The second principle deals with health in a holistic way, addressing not only physical but also mental, spiritual and social wellbeing. "Was any of this a consideration when WHO endorsed more than two years of absolute plandemic hell?3-The third – and this one is really important – deals with the right to bodily autonomy. In essence, WHO is supposed to respect the right of every individual to choose his own path to health – meaning no mandates, period.Fourthly, WHO is supposed to support only those health interventions that a person chooses individually. Building on the third principle, the fourth stresses once again that sovereignty and individual liberty is to be upheld at all costs.“Health professionals must obtain informed and voluntary consent from individuals before any medical intervention,” reads the fifth point. “Inaccurate information, psychological manipulation and any form of coercion render consent invalid.”The sixth deals with medical information remaining private. For instance, nobody else has any right to know your vaccination status because it is none of their business.The last four principles deal with closely evaluating the needs of a community based on the alleged threat; looking at the long-term implications of any new health policy; utilizing the input of individuals and communities in forming those policies; and only forming policies based on truth rather than politics.Did WHO follow any of these guidelines throughout the plandemic? The answer is no. And public health is no better off because of it.“The rules have changed,” wrote someone at Exposé News. “This is about depopulation, sterilization and authoritarian control. The elite know the financial system is going to collapse and are not going to have angry hordes taking their ill begotten gains.”“We will be reduced and starved into submission. Human rights legislation served its purpose at the time, but it’s not worth the paper it’s written on. Global genocide awaits … Keep believing the media about COVID, Ukraine, monkeypox, smallpox and COVID again at your own peril – it’s all part of the fear campaign to keep the ignorant masses under control.”*************************1- “Todo lo que hace la OMS va EN CONTRA de los principios de la salud pública” 08/08/2022 / por Ethan Huff Abir Ballan ha elaborado una tesis de 43 páginas llamada "La revisión de la OMS y por qué es importante para usted" que expone la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) como una organización política altamente corrupta que promueve la tiranía en nombre de la "salud pública". Publicado en el sitio web Pandemics Data & Analytics (PANDA), "la tesis desafía directamente la supuesta autoridad de la OMS como líder en salud pública mundial" Revela que casi nada de lo que hace la OMS tiene nada que ver con la salud pública, ya que casi todo tiene motivaciones políticas. “Esta revisión le brinda información clave para ayudarlo a evaluar la candidatura de la OMS como una organización autorizada de salud pública mundial”, dijo PANDA. "Proporciona información básica sobre salud pública y principios de gestión de pandemias según lo acordado previamente por esta rama de las Naciones Unidas". “El análisis PANDA le permitirá evaluar la solidez de la respuesta recomendada por la OMS al COVID-19 [coronavirus de Wuhan] y la viruela del mono, y determinar hasta qué punto la OMS siguió sus propias recomendaciones desarrolladas previamente. Continúa resumiendo los supuestos subyacentes a sus recomendaciones de Covid-19, seguido de un resumen de las recomendaciones finales”.Se supone que la OMS protege la libertad médica y apoya la autonomía corporal individualSe supone que la OMS debe seguir los 10 Principios de Salud Pública descritos en sus políticas oficiales cuando se trata de una emergencia de salud pública. En cambio, el brazo de las Naciones Unidas los desechó a todos cuando llegó el COVID-19.El primer principio, relacionado con la dignidad humana y las libertades personales, fue casi descartado "cuando la OMS apoyó el cierre de empresas""máscaras y otras formas de fascismo médico""La OMS también ha estado implicada en la posible construcción y liberación del arma biológica del coronavirus)"?2-El segundo principio trata la salud de manera holística, abordando no solo el bienestar físico sino también el mental, espiritual y social.¿Fue algo de esto una consideración cuando la OMS respaldó dos años de infierno planmico absoluto?3-La tercera –y esto es realmente importante– trata del derecho a la autonomía corporal. En esencia, se supone que la OMS debe respetar el derecho de cada individuo a elegir su propio camino hacia la salud, lo que significa que no hay mandatos, punto.4-Cuarto, se supone que la OMS respalda solo aquellas intervenciones de salud que una persona elige individualmente. Sobre la base del tercer principio, el cuarto enfatiza una vez más que la soberanía y la libertad individuales deben defenderse a toda costa. “Los profesionales de la salud deben obtener el consentimiento informado y voluntario de las personas antes de cualquier intervención médica”, reza el quinto punto. "La información inexacta, la manipulación psicológica y cualquier forma de coerción invalidan el consentimiento". El sexto trata de la privacidad de la información médica. Por ejemplo, nadie más tiene derecho a conocer su estado de vacunación porque no es de su incumbencia. Los últimos cuatro principios se ocupan de evaluar de cerca las necesidades de una comunidad en función de la supuesta amenaza; mirar las implicaciones a largo plazo de cualquier nueva política de salud; usar aportes de individuos y comunidades para dar forma a esas políticas; y solo formando políticas basadas en la verdad más que en la política. ¿Siguió la OMS alguna de estas pautas durante la pandemia? La respuesta es no. Y la salud pública no es mejor por ello. “Las reglas han cambiado”, escribió alguien en Exposé News. “Se trata de despoblación, esterilización y control autoritario. La élite sabe que el sistema financiero se va a derrumbar y que no van a tener hordas enojadas que se lleven sus ganancias ilícitas”. “Seremos cortados y moriremos de hambre hasta la sumisión. La legislación de derechos humanos cumplió su propósito en ese momento, pero no vale ni el papel en el que está escrita. El genocidio global aguarda... Sigue creyendo en los medios sobre el COVID, Ucrania, la viruela del mono, la viruela y el COVID nuevamente bajo tu propio riesgo: todo es parte de la campaña de miedo para mantener a raya a las masas ignorantes".1- “Everything the WHO does goes AGAINST the principles of public health” 08/08/2022 / by Ethan Huff Abir Ballan has put together a 43-page thesis called "The WHO review and why it matters to you" which exposes the World Health Organization (WHO) "as a highly corrupt political organization that promotes tyranny in the name of "public health". Posted on the Pandemics Data & Analytics (PANDA) website, "the thesis directly challenges the supposed authority of the WHO as a leader in global public health" It reveals that almost nothing the WHO does has anything to do with public health, since almost everything is politically motivated. “This review empowers you with key information to help you assess WHO's candidacy as an authoritative global public health organization,” said PANDA. "It provides basic information on public health and pandemic management principles as previously agreed upon by this branch of the United Nations." “The PANDA analysis will allow you to assess the robustness of the WHO-recommended response to [Wuhan coronavirus] COVID-19 and monkeypox, and determine how closely WHO followed its own previously developed recommendations. It goes on to summarize the assumptions underlying its Covid-19 recommendations, followed by a summary of the final recommendations.” WHO is supposed to protect medical freedom and support individual bodily autonomy The WHO is supposed to follow the 10 Principles of Public Health outlined in its official policies when dealing with a public health emergency. Instead, the arm of the United Nations scrapped them all when COVID-19 hit. The first principle, dealing with human dignity and personal freedoms, was all but scrapped as the WHO supported lockdowns, business closures, "masks and other forms of medical fascism" "The WHO has also been implicated in the possible construction and release of the coronavirus bioweapon)." 2-The second principle treats health holistically, addressing not only physical well-being but also mental, spiritual and social. "Was any of this a consideration when the WHO backed over two years of absolute planmic hell? 3-The third –and this is really important– deals with the right to bodily autonomy. In essence, the WHO is supposed to respect the right of each individual to choose their own path to health, which means no mandates, period. Fourth, the WHO is supposed to endorse only those health interventions that a person individually chooses. Building on the third principle, the fourth emphasizes once again that individual sovereignty and freedom must be defended at all costs. "Health professionals must obtain the informed and voluntary consent of people before any medical intervention," reads the fifth point. "Inaccurate information, psychological manipulation and any form of coercion invalidate consent." The sixth deals with the privacy of medical information. For example, no one else has the right to know your vaccination status because it is none of their business. The last four principles deal with closely assessing the needs of a community based on the assumed threat; look at the long-term implications of any new health policy; use input from individuals and communities to shape those policies; and only forming policies based on truth rather than politics. Did the WHO follow any of these guidelines during the pandemic? The answer is no. And public health is no better for it. “The rules have changed,” someone wrote on Exposé News. “This is about depopulation, sterilization and authoritarian control. The elite know that the financial system is going to collapse and they are not going to have angry hordes taking their ill-gotten gains.” “We will be cut down and starve into submission. The human rights legislation served its purpose at the time, but it is not worth the paper it is written on. Global genocide awaits... Keep believing the media about COVID, Ukraine, monkeypox, smallpox and COVID again at your own peril - it's all part of the campaign of fear to keep the ignorant masses in check ".